No great artist ever sees things as they are. If he did, he would cease to be an artist.
-Oscar Wilde  


The physical exam of the head and neck is both simple and challenging. Simple, in that even children are familiar with the shape of the face, the sheen of the eye, the curve of the ear, and the texture of the tongue. Challenging, because when complicated, interlacing structures malfunction, they send mixed and subtle messages.

Last month, over 200 second-year medical students descended on the ENT clinic for an afternoon. We supplied lights, ear specula and tongue depressors. They supplied the energy and curiosity as they practiced peeking in each other’s ears and throats. Some brought along their brand new $400 otoscopes. Most will never spend another minute working with me or my colleagues to learn the head and neck examination.

Is the physical exam even important anymore?

A recent story on National Public Radio confirms that some physicians skip the physical exam because they find that the quick 15 minutes allotted to an office visit is better spent engaged in conversation and reviewing test results. They also acknowledge that some of the parts of the examination are so difficult and subjective that an expensive test (for example, a $600 echocardiogram) might be more reliable than using a stethoscope to diagnose a murmur or extra sound.

The modern, technology-savvy doctors are probably correct, but, when it comes to a decent physical exam, I am painfully old-fashioned. I really enjoy the process of discovery that the exam provides by melding physical findings with the patient’s story to arrive at a diagnosis. It is far from a perfect science, but it is important work at which we can only improve with practice. The "laying on of hands" remains a big part of what I do in the office.

A friend of mine told me about returning to see a doctor that was caring for her broken ankle.

"I saw the physician three times and he never actually touched my leg! My ankle healed up just fine, but it seemed odd that he examined me only by looking at my X-rays. Is that typical?"

I do not know what is typical anymore.

During my training, we flocked to learn from the gifted diagnosticians — the curious, thorough, patient, and perceptive teachers who could use their hands, ears and sense of smell to arrive at an obscure diagnosis. Even as technology pushes to every corner of Medicine, I am hopeful that we will always have those master clinicians among us.


The following is feedback received for this blog:

Nice Blog!!!
Thanks For Great Information.

- suvarna bhagwat



I recently saw a surgeon about my torn rotator cuff. He asked all sorts of questions, and I pointed out that I had had an MRI. He replied that looking at the MRI first was cheating. Sounded right to me.

- Bruce Small

 

Thumbnail
About the Author

Bruce Campbell, MD, grew up in the Chicago area, graduating from Purdue University and Rush Medical College. He completed an otolaryngology residency at the Medical College of Wisconsin and a head and neck surgery fellowship at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. He was a faculty member, ENT specialist and surgeon with Froedtert & MCW health network from 1987 until his retirement in 2021.

Explore more articles